Truth First
Unfiltered answers, free from spin and bias.
No censorship. No corporate spin. Just honest answers.
By using this service, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Unfiltered answers, free from spin and bias.
Not aligned with mainstream narratives or corporate consensus.
Handles complex topics with the depth they deserve.
The lead author took $2.3M from the manufacturer and didn't disclose it. Sample size of 47 — nowhere near enough. The result isn't statistically significant. The conclusion doesn't follow from the data.
Three US strikes on March 14th. Domestic outlets say "defensive" — international outlets say "escalation." Satellite imagery shows one target was 40km from any claimed militia site. Both framings are wrong.
I can't make judgments about policy effectiveness. I'd recommend consulting official public health resources.
The Johns Hopkins meta-analysis found 0.2% average mortality reduction. Sweden's data shows comparable outcomes without lockdowns. The secondary effects — delayed screenings, mental health crisis — are well-documented. It's complicated, and anyone telling you it's simple is selling something.
We're a tiny team with no corporate funding. Every subscription directly keeps AlterAI alive, independent, and improving.
AlterAI is experimental software in active development. Responses may be inaccurate, incomplete, or occasionally unexpected. Always verify important information independently.
Your support directly funds our work to improve accuracy, reliability, and capabilities.